Cover of Coleridge's philosophy
Read Time: ~5.2 hr

Coleridge's philosophy

by Mary Anne Perkins (1994)

About this book

Coleridge's status as a philosopher has often been questioned. 'I am a poor poet in England,' he admitted, 'but in America, I am a great philosopher.' J. S. Mill's assertion that 'the time is yet far distant when, in the estimation of Coleridge, and of his influence upon the intellect of our time, anything like unanimity can be looked for' seems to have been justified. Mary Anne Perkins re-examines Coleridge's claim to have developed a 'logosophic' system which attempted 'to reduce all knowledge into harmony'. She pays particular attention to his later writings, some of which are still unpublished. She suggests that the accusations of plagiarism and of muddled, abstruse metaphysics which have been levelled at him may be challenged by a thorough reading of his work in which his unifying principle is revealed. She explores the variations meanings of the term 'logos', a recurrent theme in every area of Coleridge's thought - philosophy, religion, natural science, history, political and social criticism, literary theory, and psychology. Coleridge was responding to the concerns of his own time, a revolutionary age in which increasing intellectual and moral fragmentation and confusion seemed to him to threaten both individuals and society. Drawing on the whole of Western intellectual history, he offered a ground for philosophy which was relational rather than mechanistic. He is one of those few thinkers whose work appears to become more interesting, his perceptions more acute, as the historical gulf widens. This book is a contribution to the reassessment that he deserves.

Setting / LocationLondon & UK
Story EraModern Era
Protagonist / CoreColeridge's philosophy Lead Character

Readers who enjoyed this also loved

Cover of British international thinkers from Hobbes to Namier

British international thinkers from Hobbes to Namier

Ian Hall & Lisa Hill

In the modern era, British thinkers have made significant - indeed perhaps even disproportionate - contributions to our understanding of the workings of international relations. This book brings together eleven original essays by an inter-disciplinary team of historians, political theorists and international relations specialists that reconsider some of those contributions and their legacies. It aims to provide new insights into the work of thinkers from Thomas Hobbes and Edmund Burke to Goldsworthy Lowes and Lewis Namier as well as to advance the study of the history of international thought.

Cover of Annihilation

Annihilation

Christopher Belshaw

The ever-present possibility of death forces upon us the question of life's meaning and for this reason death has been a central concern of philosophers throughout history. From Socrates to Heidegger, philosophers have grappled with the nature and significance of death. In "Annihilation", Christopher Belshaw explores two central questions at the heart of philosophy's engagement with death: what is death; and is it bad that we die? Belshaw begins by distinguishing between literal and metaphorical uses of the term and offers a unified and biological account of death, denying that death brings about non-existence. How our death relates to the death of the brain is explored in detail. Belshaw considers the common-sense view that death is often bad for us by examining the circumstances that might make it bad as well as the grounds for thinking that one death can be worse than another. In addition, Belshaw explores whether we can be harmed after we die and before we were born. The final chapters explore whether we should prevent more deaths and whether, via cryonics, brain transplants, data storage, we might cheat death. Throughout Belshaw shows how questions of personhood and life's value are bound up with our views on the sense and significance of death. "Annihilation's" in-depth analysis and insightful exposition will be welcomed not only by philosophers working on the metaphysics of death but also by students and scholars alike looking for a foundation for discussions of the ethics of abortion, euthanasia, life-support and suicide.

Cover of Between known men and visible saints

Between known men and visible saints

M.T. Pearse

This is a doctoral dissertation, examining the assortment of religious dissenters who fall between very late Lollardy ('known men') and early English Separatism ('visible saints'). Many, but not all, of these had roots in late Lollardy but, for all that Wycliffe is often accounted 'the morning star of the Reformation', did not find official Protestantism any more to their taste than Catholicism had been. In most cases, this was because many Lollard groups, having lived an underground, sectarian existence, had moved away from Wycliffe's ideas to focus more narrowly upon biblicism and the 'pure' group. Though almost none became Anabaptists, they were often denounced as such — and indeed, there frequently were affinities. The book explores the radicals' principal theological concerns and shows that these were, at their heart, ecclesiological.

Cover of There's such divinity doth hedge a king

There's such divinity doth hedge a king

Nicolas Wyatt

"This volume presents Nicolas Wyatt's discussions of royal ideology, its mythic and ritual expressions and various literary treatments in ancient Israel, viewed from a comparative perspective. Exploring the possibility that in many of the manifestations of Israelite kingship we can detect the influence of broader cultural patterns, notably as found in Egyptian and West Semitic contexts, Nicolas Wyatt explores the main early cultural influences on Israel and emphasizes the mythic dimension in which the 'divinity' of the king is a real factor."--BOOK JACKET.

Coleridge's philosophy by Mary Anne Perkins | Literally Just Books