by Jerry Zeifman (1995)
Without Honor documents that the Judiciary Committee's investigation of Watergate was a sham in which present First Lady Hillary Clinton, recent White House counsel Bernard Nussbaum, and others who served on the impeachment inquiry staff abdicated their responsibilities to conduct a thorough investigation. Instead, the sham inquiry was structured by its leaders - all of whom were high Justice Department officials during the Kennedy administration - to avoid disclosure of the crimes of Camelot.
Cass R. Sunstein
"Cass Sunstein considers actual and imaginable arguments for a president's removal, explaining why some cases are easy and others hard, why some arguments for impeachment are judicious and others not. In direct and approachable terms, he dispels the fog surrounding impeachment so that all Americans may use their ultimate civic authority wisely"--
Victor Lasky
The author contends that Watergate was mainly a media event, points to Democratic scandals which have been relatively ignored, and claims that leading Democtats were fully aware of plans for the break-in and did nothing to prevent it.
Fred Emery
Now with a new afterword by the author, here is the definitive history of the Watergate scandal - based on the most recently released tapes, in-depth interviews with many of the participants, and hundreds of official and unofficial documents, including notes Haldeman omitted from his own published diaries. Emery's comprehensive coverage and penetrating insights clear up many uncertainties that may still remain about the scandal and the extent of Nixon's involvement. Authoritative and compelling, Watergate is essential reading for anyone who wants to understand fully this traumatizing episode in America's history that challenged the integrity of its political system.
Norman G. Finkelstein
Finkelstein, a political science professor and author of The Holocaust Industry: Reflections on the Exploitation of Jewish Suffering, has conducted a rancorous public feud with Harvard Law professor and pro-Israel stalwart Alan Dershowitz over the latter's The Case for Israel, and here expands his arguments into a vigorous polemic on the Israeli-Palestinian conflict. The first part of the book examines what he feels is a growing tendency of pro-Israel commentators to use spurious charges of anti-Semitism to deflect and discredit legitimate criticism of Israel. The second, much longer, part is a line-by-line debunking of The Case for Israel, which he compares to Communist apologetics for Stalinist Russia.